Virtual Pulp Press began as an online store catering to men who like to read. The Two-Fisted Blog was a review site for men's fiction and â€œmovies for guys who like movies.â€ The two combined forces at Virtual Pulp and do all that they did before, plus comment on culture, sports, music, news...and an occasional game.
This what your Virtual Pulp Blog Ad will look like to visitors! Of course you will want to use keywords and ad targeting to get the most out of your ad campaign! So purchase an ad space today before there all gone!
notice: Total Ad Spaces Available: (2) ad spaces remaining of (2)
This particular incident took place in the UK, but the same garbage is happening in the US, too. The debacle started on June 20, after Farrell received propaganda-like LGBT coloring material from his teacher Alex Smith. When asked if he could skip the activity, Smith denied Farell’s request and told him it was part of...
This particular incident took place in the UK, but the same garbage is happening in the US, too.
The debacle started on June 20, after Farrell received propaganda-like LGBT coloring material from his teacher Alex Smith. When asked if he could skip the activity, Smith denied Farell’s request and told him it was part of the curriculum.
Later, Smith accused Farrell of saying “LGBT sucks and LGBT’s dumb,” however, the pre-teen denies ever using “homophobic language.”
What happened next is demonstrative of how these reprobates operate and how they’ve taken over the culture: they lie, then accuse their victims of lying. Their lie usually involves some variation of conflating opposition to their cultural Marxist policy with threatened violence or or at least violent sentiments. This is a tried and true tactic to marginalize opinions that others might share. If you can condition normies to believe that anybody opposed to sodomy (for instance) is actually a dangerous lunatic bent on violence, the normies, averse to agreeing with violent lunatics, will obediently conform to the agenda you’re pushing on them. This is all following a proven and well-worn script.
You can bet money that the kids would have been called “racist,” too, if they weren’t black.
In this British school, the adult educator is trying to use the tactic against 10-year-old children. Also, as is pretty typical in the culture war, the cultural Marxists in power violate their own rules in enforcing conformity, and are unlikely to ever be called out for their blatant hypocrisy.
“How dare you? You are a disappointment to the school,” Papas said, according to the two students.
Papas — whose daughter is lesbian and the School Manager — reportedly reamed Kaysey after the kids were put in separate rooms, saying, “How dare you say that you want to kill LGBT people?”‘I didn’t say kill.” Kaysey responded. Papas shouted back “Yes, you did, and don’t lie” before beginning the detention.
The mothers of Farrell and Kaysey are fighting the suspension, noting that students cannot be suspended for “a non-disciplinary reason,” per the school’s own regulations.
It’s the same principle you see at work in mainstream politics: anybody who disagrees with a rabid leftist is “a Nazi” or “literally Hitler,” therefore any assault against the political opposition is justified.
This is the motive behind words like “homophobia.” The word “phobia” means “fear.” People disgusted by perversions are not afraid of the perverts, but they have to be characterized as being consumed with fear and hate in order to demonize them and prevent the normies from agreeing with them. Some of the cultural Marxists are telegraphing the next abomination they intend to normalize…you may have noticed some woke activists slinging the term “pedophobe” around. Eventually, you must assent to them molesting your children, or be condemned for “fear” and “hate.”
The goal of the sodomite lobby was never just tolerance, or getting medical insurance for their partners, or any of the other carefully-crafted lies they sold you. It is to utterly crush any resistance to their sick agenda, and establish absolute conformism. That is why they seek out bakeries and preachers who want nothing to do with “gay weddings”–so that the coercive force of government can be used to destroy those who resist conformity.
This is what appeasement and tolerance has wrought. God warned us that certain behavior should not be tolerated…but then the first battle of this war was to cast doubt on the moral authority of God–and His very existence.
First of all, Happy Birthday, America. This Independence Day is probably a good time to make a point about something that’s become controversial in recent years. There is a faction at work in the political landscape that seems to have a vested interest in convincing right-wingers to abandon our commitment to freedom through individual rights...
First of all, Happy Birthday, America.
This Independence Day is probably a good time to make a point about something that’s become controversial in recent years. There is a faction at work in the political landscape that seems to have a vested interest in convincing right-wingers to abandon our commitment to freedom through individual rights (which the Founding Fathers won for us), and instead obsess over petty, superficial genetic differences.
A descent into white tribalism under an appropriately pale “god-emperor” is the only thing that can save “muh westurn sivulizayshun,” they tell us. I suspect some of them actually believe it. Part of their dogma has necessarily been to ridicule the idea of equality–especially as it is so famously referred to in the Declaration of Independence.
First of all, some of the men who supported the Patriot cause during the Revolution certainly harbored sentiments that are considered racist (or at least separatist) today. Some of them may have even been almost as racially-obsessed as the current Democrat Party…though that’s rather difficult to imagine. This is not an attempt to whitewash them all as abolitionists or colorblind according to the Current Year ideal.
But secondly, neither were they stupid. The Founders were highly intelligent men, more literate than probably anybody who currently works in Washington DC, or in the mainstream media.
Time-warp the Founding Fathers to present-day America, sit them down for a debate, and none of them would try to argue that Mike Tyson has the exact same capabilities as Stephen Hawking and vice-versa. That was not intended by the phrase “all men are created equal.”
You must appreciate, first, that English is an evolving language. Devolving for the last couple generations, actually. Some words have changed meanings, while others have lost certain nuances, and what was as obvious back then as the nose on your face is now in question, or even flat-out denied. What didn’t even need explanation to the average layman in the 18th Century is beyond the reckoning of the dumbed-down Useful Idiots of today.
Secondly, you must appreciate that the constitutional republic in America is utterly unique in world history. Whether monarchies, sultanates, or empires, the governments of the world had predominantly been formed upon the premise that the people in the ruling class are inherently superior to the serfs, peasants, and other citizens. Yes, there were anomalies like Iceland, and even the British flirted with the idea of individual rights, but most of the human race was conditioned to believe that;
The Founders had a radical idea: that every man was a free moral agent with the same opportunity to accept salvation from their Creator. They believed that government should serve people–not the other way around–by protecting the individual rights endowed to each man by virtue of being a creation of God. Nobody had more or better rights simply because they were born to a certain family. All were blessed by God and accountable to God. What they earned belonged to them; they were free to make their own decisions; and they owed their lives to no earthly king.
This concept of individual rights was not popular, even in a Great Britain which had grown increasingly liberal* since the Magna Carta.
The Founders bothered to spell out their beliefs precisely because they were so idiosyncratic in a world where most people accepted the idea that those born to a “higher station” should rule, and law should hang on their every whim and fancy. Americans rejected the notion that anyone was owed anything by someone else simply by virtue of who they were born to (so much for Affirmative Action).
Contrary to either revisionist narrative you’re likely to hear, the Founding Fathers were neither white supremacists, nor egalitarians of the Baby Boomer stripe.
The word “equal” was used not to imply that every single man has the same exact capabilities, but to mean that nobody is actually born to a “higher station,” giving them the right to dictate when another man should live or die, to make their decisions for them, or to take for themselves the ownership of human beings that only God can rightfully claim. All men are equally accountable to God, and under His authority, subject to the same self-evident laws and endowed with the same unalienable rights.
*I use the word “liberal” to convey the word’s actual meaning. I do not use it in the Newspeak context it is so mindlessly used today.
A link was shared on MeWe about a judge who ruled that boys and girls in high school must shower together “in order to accommodate transgender students.” I commented on the thread, as did many others. Then some guy posted the following: “Boy oh boy would I like to see that happen . my daughter...
A link was shared on MeWe about a judge who ruled that boys and girls in high school must shower together “in order to accommodate transgender students.” I commented on the thread, as did many others. Then some guy posted the following:
“Boy oh boy would I like to see that happen . my daughter in action you see some dumbass get in the shower with her and she Going to knock him on his ass my girl is one badass” (sic)
And the guy has a Gadsen Flag as his profile pic. It’s looking like, outside of Virtual Pulp, there is no organization, group, institution or movement that hasn’t been infected by this feminista virus.
First of all, he’s delusional. Mediocre male athletes are “identifying” as female all over the place and trouncing the best female athletes in their respective sports. The guy has watched too many Kickass Grrrrl Power scenes in action movies, and has confused fetish with reality. But that isn’t the point, here.
This person is not alone. Legions of “conservative” parents have been raising their daughters to be masculine, even if they’re not jock-ettes. The “female ideal” our depraved culture has been foisting on us is women who talk like men, act like men, and even look like men (just look at all the broad shouldered, narrow hipped, square jawed models and actresses sold to us as “female sex symbols”). Dads like this guy are fully on board with all that, even if they vehemently disagree with those silly libruls about kneeling during the National Anthem.
They don’t mind gender-bending, unless it goes too far too fast. They’ll obediently have their children flirt with gender confusion, just as long as they don’t go all the way.
It’s nearly as bad in the “alt right” as it is in “conservatism.” For people so obsessed about “muh westurn sivulizayshun,” they’ve apparently never made the connection that Rome didn’t conquer the known world with coed legions led by Kickass Womyn Warriors. Sane civilizations recognized that there are biological differences between the TWO genders, and the roles men and women played lined up with their capabilities. Women are biologically suited to caring for children and keeping the home, with a degree of competency that men can’t equal. Men are biologically suited to hunt, build, explore, and fight, on a competency level that women can’t approach without imposed handicapping.
Women were not designed to be “badasses.” Denying that is a symptom of a contrived fetish. It’s a wildly popular and state-approved fetish, but still just a fetish. Women who think they are badasses are not very attractive, therefore less likely to excel at what they are designed for (childbearing, nurturing children, etc.).
Obviously, the society we live in, through relentless conditioning, has been trained to reject reality. “Conservatives” have obediently jumped on the gender-bending bandwagon. Now they’re starting to realize where the bandwagon is going, and are horrified…but too invested in feminist myths to decisively jump off and change course.
You don’t need to be a QAnon follower, or necessarily even believe in Q, to enjoy this comic. You don’t have to believe a man can fly to enjoy Superman stories either (although these days you probably do need to be a drooling commie NPC). Chuck Dixon is in fine form here, mixing together compelling...
You don’t need to be a QAnon follower, or necessarily even believe in Q, to enjoy this comic. You don’t have to believe a man can fly to enjoy Superman stories either (although these days you probably do need to be a drooling commie NPC).
Chuck Dixon is in fine form here, mixing together compelling plot elements to weave a story that will be exciting and fascinating, judging by this first issue. Alt★Hero has struggled a bit with some of the artwork so far but I can assure you the visuals in this issue are superb.
The protagonist is a Treasury Agent. We are introduced to him as he and a team of other door-kickers are raiding a supposed counterfeit operation. Through efficient storytelling, we learn that there is a mysterious cover-up underway, which this raid serves, and there is at least one compromised agent on the team.
Not everything sits well with Agent Dane. Something stinks about that op and how one of the suspects was snuffed. Is his heresy the very reason Dane is assigned bodyguard duty for a VIP visiting Peru? I can’t wait to find out.
For those who wonder, as they read, what this story has to do with Q…don’t worry. The dots will be connected by the time you’re done.
I do have a couple technical gripes: An M2 Browning .50, by itself, is not a “Ma Deuce.” But it will not only Swiss-cheese a pickup truck, its slugs will mangle the people inside the vehicle on their way through it. That Dane needed an M4 to take out the unscathed leftovers from an entire belt of .50 is kind of ridiculous. But Dixon apparently knows some veterans, so hopefully they will set him straight for the future.
Based on my reading of the first issue, I can’t recommend this series highly enough.
In conjunction with LibertyCon 2019, CLFA is hosting a book sale–E-Books and paperbacks. Some, like my Retreads series, will be on sale through Independence Day. Happy reading!
The subtitle says “A Post-Apocalyptic Novel,” and this book is the first in “The New World Series.” The story is told in flashback via a surviving character in 2066 “Cascadia.” That character is in bookend chapters that frame the narrative. The main story opens in the suburbs of San Diego right before an EMP turns...
The subtitle says “A Post-Apocalyptic Novel,” and this book is the first in “The New World Series.”
The story is told in flashback via a surviving character in 2066 “Cascadia.” That character is in bookend chapters that frame the narrative. The main story opens in the suburbs of San Diego right before an EMP turns out the lights, permanently. A little bit of time is spent establishing that the protagonist, Gordon Van Zandt, is a dedicated family man with just enough soy in his diet to make him palatable to female readers. He’s an Iraq veteran whose little brother is currently in the USMC, hoping to become a scout-sniper.
In the author bio section of the Amazon product page, the author claims to be a USMC veteran. That may be true–there is at least some rudimentary military knowledge evident. Maybe he had a rear-echelon clerk/jerk MOS. There were a few details here and there that didn’t sit right, but not enough to make you toss the book aside, by any stretch.
The EMP strikes the USA, and Gordon goes into Scramble, Forage, and Protect Mode. (While doing so, he explains what an EMP is far too many times for a reader with reasonable memory retention.) His family-first instincts kick into high gear right away, which cause him to make some tough decisions that others are not yet ready to make.
The plot toggles between Gordon’s ordeal, little brother Sebastian’s story, and federal-level politicians. For the most part, the character interactions are believable, although there is a high Character Stupidity Quotient in effect–especially when it comes to Sebastian. Sebastian is such an idiot that, were he the star of the show, I probably would have quit reading. Ironic, because toward the end, I found his story the most interesting. I lost patience and began to skim through the sub-plots with the Speaker of the House-turned-President, his wife, Vice President, assistants and generals. Those segments resembled a literary soap opera that aren’t really even necessary for the plot.
Speaking of plot, this one does not suffer from predictability. I wonder how much of that was by design and how much was because the author was just making it up as he went along. I strongly suspected the latter when it came to Jimmy, Gordon’s neighbor. When first introduced, the reader gets the impression Gordon barely knew Jimmy; but as the chapters plod forward, a transformation takes place and the two neighbors have been great friends for years.
One of the most annoying personality traits of Gordon Van Zandt is his tendency to make promises he can’t keep. A lot of the dialog is amateurish as well, but then I guess this is the author’s first novel.
I made the decision to buy this book after reading some of the complaints by the one-star reviewers that there wasn’t enough GRRRL POWER on display. Sure enough: there was a lot less feminist garbage than you get in the average novel–whatever side of the aisle the authors fall on. I was thankful for that, but I was hoping (if there was any evidence of author worldview at all) that the author would turn out to be a patriot or full-bore, unapologetic, firebreathing right-winger. The overall flavor, however, is Log Cabin NeoCuck. By the second novel it becomes blatantly obvious, but I’ll say more if/when I review the sequel.
I guess the only full-bore, unapologetic, firebreathing right-wing authors on the cultural landscape these days are under Virtual Pulp’s umbrella.
Or if you prefer use one of our linkware images? Click here
If you are the owner of Virtual Pulp, or someone who enjoys this blog why not upgrade it to a Featured Listing or Permanent Listing?